HNC Home Page
News Business Arts & Life Sports Opinion Calendar Archive About Us
CRUNCH TIME: Students hit the books and the laptops in the library as finals get under way. / Photo by Jen Beasley

Today's word on journalism

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

A FINAL WORD
Dear WORDies:

All good things come to an end, they say. Not-so-good things, too, for that matter.

This marks the last word of the 11th season of TODAY'S WORD ON JOURNALISM (pause for shrieks, applause, heavy sighs, general hand-wringing and sobbing), the international daily email spam of soundbites about the press, free expression, engaged citizenship, spelling, public life, writing, and sweatsocks.

Normally, the WORD continues its reign of terror through the second week of May. But this year, WORDmeister Ted Pease is on sabbatical from his day job, and has the chance at a junket. "So," he mused as he headed for the airport, "enough is enuff."

As Xenocrates (396-314 BC) famously whipped, "I have often regretted my speech, never my silence." In the WORD's case, what could be more true?

The WORD will meet with moguls who think 11 or 12 years' accumulation of its "wisdom" might make a book, a movie, or even a weblog. Exciting times, enhanced by St. Mumbles' tender chemical therapies. Stay tuned.

In the meantime, dear WORDsters, keep the faith. Tom Stoppard's right: "Words are sacred. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones, in the right order, you can nudge the world a little."

Nudge on.

Ted Pease, WORDmeister
Pease Omphaloskepsis Institute (POI)
Trinidad, California

Heard on the street: Providence residents weigh in on Romney and religion

By Maddie Wilson

March 9, 2007 | PROVIDENCE -- Americans should focus on Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's "hideous, revolting idea for a health care plan" instead of his religious views when considering him for president, according to one Providence resident.

Laura Fisher said citizens should not consider a presidential candidate's religious views when voting, but rather their policies, such as Romney's health care plan. She said most Americans do not heavily consider a candidate's religious beliefs, and this was shown when Romney was elected governor in Massachusetts.

"If you can win governor in Massachusetts, it doesn't seem like [religion] would be a problem," Fisher said.

Other Providence residents, responding to an informal survey on Romney and his religion, had a variety of responses.

Resident Darlene Henderson also said citizens do not consider religion because beliefs "do not play a role in what they are capable of doing and what they can bring to the table."

"A voter needs to look for qualifications, experience, values, and what the candidate stands for," said Henderson.

Providence resident Michael Lewis and City Council member Trent Rasmussen, however, said Romney's religious views will be a factor for voters even though they shouldn't.

"When there's a Mormon, people suddenly think it's bad," said Rasmussen.

Lewis and Rasmussen said that most people do not accept Mormons because they do not know very much about what they believe.

"If people would look into the fundamentals of the Mormon religion, they wouldn't have a problem with them," said Rasmussen. He said that a positive stamp would be placed on the Mormon religion if Romney was elected because people could learn more about Mormon beliefs.

Lewis, however, said that no stamp of approval would be placed on the Mormon religion if Romney was elected.

Rasmussen said that he takes some consideration of a candidate's religion when he votes.

"It has some bearing on how my opinion would be, but not much," said Rasmussen.

"What he would do for us as a community, his goals and objectives" also matter, he said.

MS
MS

Copyright 1997-2007 Utah State University Department of Journalism & Communication, Logan UT 84322, (435) 797-3292
Best viewed 800 x 600.