| The
arts have no place in public education
By Leslie Mason
October 22, 2007 | "A comprehensive education is a
well-stocked pharmacy, but we have no assurance that
potassium cyanide will not be administered for a head
cold." This quote by Karl Kraus clearly illustrates
one danger that comes from giving children too much
in their education. By forcing students to take superfluous
classes like theater, music, or painting, administrators
are overmedicating children in reference to their education.
Fortunately, "the arts" are dramatically diminishing
in most classrooms around Utah, easing the mental burden
on children. Students are restricted to contemplating
the more useful, life-changing fields of science and
mathematics.
According to the director of the Coalition for Arts
in Utah Schools (CAUS), the decrease of the arts in
schools is more rampant than could have been hoped.
Early elementary school classes in Utah are no longer
incorporating any arts programs in their school curriculum.
Our society has finally advanced enough that we have
discarded many of the programs that will individualize
and estrange the students.
The kids of future generations don't have to learn
to color between the lines or glue macaroni to construction
paper; they are allowed to simply focus on the beneficial
aspects of learning. This will prevent freethinking
children from becoming freethinking adults who will
cause strife as they try to change systems that have
worked well enough for many years. Necessity is the
mother of invention, so if a business runs well now
it's silly to change anything.
The Director of CAUS also cites pro-arts information
from a study done by the University of California. This
study stated that students involved in at least four
years of art study scored 58 points higher on verbal
and 38 points higher on math SAT tests than average
students. When this information is taken in context
and pondered realistically, however, what could the
director of an organization without a good acronym really
know? Thus, this study is very probably a poor representation
of the academic world, which happened to meet the needs
of the director. Please disregard the statistics.
Despite evidence that science-based programs are less
arduous for students, there are still many supporters
of school arts programs. Dr. Ernest Boyer, president
of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching,
stated the following: "Above all, we need the arts to
create community and to build connections across the
generations."
Also a supporter of arts education, Barbra Streisand
gives an equally tear-jerking account: "The far right
is waging a war for the soul of America by making art
a partisan issue. And by trying to cut these arts programs,
which bring culture, education, and joy into the lives
of ordinary Americans, they are hurting the very people
they claim to represent."
Fascinating. So ordinary people without extraordinary
talent can change the world and the future by simply
being exposed to the arts in their youth. Forgive me
if I'm slightly skeptical. A great student of any emphasis
can become an icon and influence the course of our world.
For example, Michelangelo in his art, Handel in his
music, Pythagoras' contributions to math, and Einstein's
theory of relativity have all changed our world permanently.
Kudos to them.
However, does every student have that kind of glimmer
hidden behind a wall of coal?
"But suppose," asks the student of the professor,
"we follow all your structural rules for writing, what
about that 'something else' that brings the book alive?
What is the formula for that? The formula for that is
not included in the curriculum."
Fannie Hurst has an excellent point. Even if schools
incorporate the arts, there is no formula or pattern
for teaching students to become great artists of one
discipline or another. Artistic talents are innate in
some students and inadequate in others. If the arts
are taught within the classroom, these differences would
become apparent to the classes and student rivalry could
result. Imagine if your son attended a theater class
where his one "academic" weakness, acting, was forced
upon him every day. Focusing students' education on
objective studies avoids this potentially self-esteem-crushing
dilemma.
Although this list of negative aspects of the arts
has been fairly conclusive thus far, it is not complete.
The arts have a final, solemn grievance against them:
expense. Artistic pursuits in schools are rarely able
to fund themselves. These unnecessary classes then take
the lion's share of limited funds just to stay afloat
financially.
Tom Neuville, a Minnesota state senator, gave his
sound opinion on the matter of an appeal for an increase
in arts funding. "People favor dedicated funding for
preserving wetlands, wildlife habitat, clean water and
other environmental activities. This is because there
is a common understanding that the State has a fiduciary
duty to preserve its natural resources. The same cannot
be said for arts funding."
Schools and communities keep crying for more arts
funding despite the fact that the funds are resulting
in no return. On the other hand, extracurricular activities
like football and basketball bring profits through ticket
prices and the items sold to consumers at games. An
art exhibit or a play rarely gets the same response
from a community. Although society in general supports
the arts in their words, they fail to support them with
their actions.
Extra funding for the arts would be a complete waste,
as students can achieve a well-rounded education without
the arts. Many extracurricular activities are in place
to help students become active and beneficial members
in their neighborhood. Students can learn much more
from participating in the Key Club than they can in
the marching band.
So. The arts are simply a load of junk with a plethora
of coincidental positive study results. Students would
benefit multiple times over by taking up a sport than
they would from picking up a saxophone.
All you community members who disagree with that statement,
show up to the next orchestra concert and tell me that
a pack of screeching violins is really making your world
a better place.
NW
RB |