Editorial:
Camera ban at Aggie games is unfair, unjustified
By Seth
R. Hawkins
October 6, 2008 | USU athletes and local Princess Diana
types can rest safe knowing the USU Athletics Department
is doing its part to prevent the lethal force of Cache
Valley paparazzi.
That's right, thanks to the so-called "professional
photography ban," there will be no more scandalous pictures
of wide receivers grabbing a pass in the end zone. No
more embarrassing tabloid pictures of forwards on the
soccer team kicking a goal or armpit shots of volleyball
players going up for a kill. And you can kiss goodbye
any night shots of Romney Stadium.
Yes, life without cameras at USU sporting events will
benefit everyone. The absence of distracting flashes
around the football stadium will likely result in increased
touchdown production, earning the Aggies their first
bowl game in recent memory.
In reality, the pro photography ban will likely result
in reduced public exposure for USU and its athletics
programs and the alienation of some of its most loyal
supporters. In short, it is a public relations disaster
perpetuated by the Athletics Department public relations
department. Ouch.
Because of this ban, doting mothers cannot use the
expensive SLR digital cameras they bought specifically
to take pictures of their child playing a sport in Aggie
uniform. Devoted fans cannot use zoom lenses to take
high-resolution pictures to post on a blog or fan site
to boast their love for their school.
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. By prohibiting
harmless pictures, the Athletics Department is denying
themselves free and widespread publicity something
most companies pay public relations agencies thousands
to millions of dollars a year to generate. Not only
is this bad PR, it is poor economics for a school that
struggles to finance its athletics programs.
If it's such bad PR, why do it?
Citing an obscure and, dare we say it, misinterpreted
passage in the NCAA Division I manual, the Athletics
Department claims that unauthorized photos of student
athletes could result in a loss of eligibility. What
a deadly threat, since athletes are constantly being
kicked off teams because of photographers. If the Athletics
Department is really worried about eligibility compliance,
it should be much more concerned about marijuana use
and other illicit activities that regularly eliminate
player eligibility.
The NCAA rules only prohibit the use of a student
athlete's name or picture from being used on commercial
items or to promote a commercial product sold by a group
without the student athlete's permission. The rules
also state this does not prohibit a private photographer
or news agency from selling pictures of student athletes
for private use.
According to the NCAA guidelines, there is no reason
to prohibit professional photography equipment from
athletic events. It isn't breaking any rules to take
a picture from the stands and later post it on a Web
site for sale or to simply have an album of pictures
for parents of student athletes.
The USU Athletics Department has more than overstepped
their bounds on this issue and refuses to admit to any
wrongdoing. In the long run, it will probably do little
more than enrage an already tepid fan base, but it's
never smart to practice poor PR.
Honestly, most people who bring professional camera
equipment to sporting events and shoot from the stands
don't know how to use those cameras beyond the basic
click and shoot functions. They just want to look impressive.
So, there's no real threat there.
Also, technological improvements in standard digital
"point and click" cameras have made these tools just
as effective as the SLR the amateur photographer brings
to a game, so prohibiting an SLR while allowing other
cameras is an unfounded bias.
The USU Athletics Department needs to step off its
high horse and concede this is a pointless regulation.
We call for a complete retraction of the ban. Allowing
photographers to shoot from the stands does nothing
to harm student athletes, while prohibiting photography
only serves to injure the reputation of the institution.
It's time to stop preventing fans from being fans and
to let the people shoot.
NW
MS |