HNC Home Page
News Business Arts & Life Sports Opinion Calendar Archive About Us
DIE-HARD AGGIE FANS: Students show their Aggie colors at the home game vs. Nevada. The Aggies came so close, but lost 31-28. Click Arts&Life for a link to photos. / Photo by Heather Routh

Today's word on journalism

Monday, October 22, 2007

Can’t Scare the Old Gray Lady:

"Good journalism for an intelligent general audience is hard. And we’re really good at it. Taking on The Times is not as easy as waving a credit card and proclaiming yourself 'fair and balanced. . . .' We have every reason to feel confident that we can hold our own if [Rupert] Murdoch decides to build The Journal beyond its business-reader base. In all the Murdoch parlor-gaming, I don’t hear anyone suggesting that he would attempt to match the depth of our coverage in culture, science, education, health, religion, sports, lifestyle, etc., etc. Not to mention business coverage that even devout Journal readers find they can’t afford to miss."

-- Bill Keller, editor, New York Times, on Murdoch’s promised Wall Street Journal challenge to Times national dominance, Oct. 16, 2007

Professors, stop grading students on class attendance

By Leslie Mason

September 28, 2007 | We've all experienced it: the first day of class. The professor walks in, hands out the syllabus, and the tyranny begins. His evil eyes squint through his plastic smile.

This smile is a trick.

He is leading students to believe that, finally, this class will be different from all the others.

It won't be different.

More and more often, USU English professors are requiring rigid attendance. Students are forced, under penalty of unredeemable grade deduction, to miss no more than two classes. If a student misses an additional class beyond her allotted two, her grade is immediately dropped one-third a letter grade.

There are many justifications teachers give for this gross error. Professors claim if a student is not present, he cannot possibly be learning and therefore his grade should be docked for failing to learn.

This excuse is easily refuted when we consider the widely used solution: testing. Students take tests for a reason, and last we checked it was to show what the students have learned from the course. Therefore, a student can prove by means other than attendance that his brain has evolved as a result of the class.

Next, professors point out that if a student does not attend a class, the other students in that class are not benefiting from her insight.

Let's face it. No one listens to anyone but themselves. We're all too busy thinking up our next profound insight to listen to the dribble other idiots come up with.

Attendance is a policy that should be encouraged, not graded. USU students have paid enough tuition to entitle them to the choice of attending class or sleeping in. Students who choose to miss multiple classes will likely pay for it, and their grade will drop accordingly as they fail all their tests. By dropping student's grade based on attendance, professors are successfully punishing that student twice. Bravo.

Professors should allow students the freedom to determine when class attendance is important. No amount of discussion or group projects is going to guide a student to greatness. In fact, it's mildly ironic that many successful writers, John Muir, for example, hated school. If he missed more than twp classes, we're all silently wondering how he ever figured out which end of a pen is up.

NW
MS

Copyright 1997-2007 Utah State University Department of Journalism & Communication, Logan UT 84322, (435) 797-3292
Best viewed 800 x 600.